Whistleblower and Leaker The Difference Between Them

Whistleblowers and leakers are terms that are often used interchangeably, but they actually refer to different types of individuals who disclose information that they believe is in the public interest. While both whistleblowers and leakers share a common goal of exposing wrongdoing or unethical behavior, there are significant differences between the two. In this article, we will explore the definitions of whistleblowers and leakers, compare and contrast the two, and provide examples of each.

What is a Whistleblower?

A whistleblower is an individual who reports illegal, unethical, or dangerous behavior within an organization to authorities or the public. Whistleblowers are often employees of the organization in question, but they can also be customers, suppliers, or other stakeholders. They typically report their concerns through established channels, such as a hotline or internal reporting system, and may be protected from retaliation under certain laws.

What is a Leaker?

A leaker is an individual who discloses confidential or classified information to the media or the public without authorization. Leakers are often insiders who have access to sensitive information, such as government or corporate secrets, and believe that the information should be made public. Unlike whistleblowers, leakers typically bypass established channels of reporting and may face legal consequences for their actions.

Definition and Meaning

Definition of Whistleblower and Leaker

Whistleblower Leaker
Reports wrongdoing Discloses info
To authorities To media or public
Legal protection Legal consequences
Through channels Bypass channels

Meaning of Whistleblower and Leaker

Whistleblowers and leakers have different motivations and methods for disclosing information. Whistleblowers are driven by a desire to expose wrongdoing and protect the public interest. They typically report their concerns through established channels and may be protected by laws such as the Whistleblower Protection Act. Leakers, on the other hand, may be motivated by a desire for fame, revenge, or a belief that the information should be made public regardless of the consequences. They often bypass established channels and may face legal consequences for their actions.

What's the Difference?

The main difference between whistleblowers and leakers is their motivation and method of disclosure. Whistleblowers are motivated by a desire to expose wrongdoing and protect the public interest, while leakers may be motivated by a desire for personal gain or revenge. Whistleblowers typically report their concerns through established channels and may be protected by law, while leakers bypass established channels and may face legal consequences for their actions.

What's the Relationship?

Whistleblowers and leakers share a common goal of exposing wrongdoing or unethical behavior, but they differ in their methods and motivations. While whistleblowers are often protected by law and may have the support of their organization, leakers are typically viewed as disloyal and may face legal consequences for their actions. Some individuals may be both whistleblowers and leakers, depending on the circumstances.

Example

A well-known example of a whistleblower is Edward Snowden, a former contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA) who leaked classified information about government surveillance programs to the media. Snowden believed that the public had a right to know about the government's actions and that the programs violated privacy rights. He bypassed established channels of reporting and fled the country to avoid prosecution.

A well-known example of a leaker is Chelsea Manning, a former soldier who leaked classified information to Wikileaks. Manning believed that the information should be made public in order to spark a public debate about the Iraq War. She was later convicted of violating the Espionage Act and served seven years in prison before being pardoned by President Obama.

Table of Comparison

Whistleblower Leaker
Reports wrongdoing Discloses confidential info
Motivated by public interest Motivated by personal gain
Report through established channels Bypass established channels
May be protected by law May face legal consequences
May have the support of organization Viewed as disloyal

Conclusion

Whistleblowers and leakers play an important role in exposing wrongdoing and unethical behavior, but they differ in their methods and motivations. Whistleblowers are driven by a desire to protect the public interest and typically report their concerns through established channels, while leakers may be motivated by personal gain and bypass established channels. It's important to understand the differences between whistleblowers and leakers in order to evaluate their actions and the impact of their disclosures.